Well, I’ve had a frustrating week. No opportunity to trade until Friday, and no opportunity to work on my website and newsletter service. NOT HAPPY!!!

But then, that happens to us all from time to time. Life has a habit of failing to consult with us, prior to messing with our plans.

What happened? Well, before I was trading I used to work as a pilot, with a specialty in aviation safety. I’ve maintained a link to that industry, and still do some work on a part-time basis. Usually it’s not a big deal at all, and I can fit it in around my life. Sometimes though, a bit of a crisis happens (safety’s like that!) and I’ve got to travel away, and well… my plans just don’t matter anymore.

Yeah, I know. I’ve got no-one to blame but myself. After all, I choose to do this. And this probably has no relevance to your life. So let me get to the point – how does this story relate to the title of this article – ‘Trading Timeframe Selection’.

Ok, those of you who have been around my website for a while know that day-trading is my thing. I like the short timeframes. Anything more than 5 minutes is way too long for me. Why is that? Well, several reasons really:

1. More action.
2. Tighter stops (I hate large losses).
3. Psychologically, I’m a bit of a control freak – I like to monitor a trade from start to finish.
4. I can sit in cash when I’m not trading, so it’s no problem if I get called away and can’t trade for a day or two.

Really, it’s all psychology!

I used to trade daily charts several years ago, and really hated the ‘surprise’ each day when I woke up to see what the US market had done to my position overnight. Now, when I’m trading, I can manage the trade closely. And when I’m not trading, I’m out of the markets. Simple!

Day-trading is just a perfect fit for my psychology. And it just happens to fit my lifestyle as well, because if I have to go away quickly I’m not leaving open trades in the markets.

For some crazy reason, about six weeks ago, I decided that I should look into trading daily charts again because that would give me more time to work on the trading education website & newsletter. I decided to trade options on equities, which would allow me to place defined-risk trades and profit from theta decay. Great plan! So I set about simulation trading for a couple of months, just to be sure it would work for me. Well, everything went fine until this week.

Suddenly, I couldn’t monitor my trades. I’m left in the market with an overall delta positive portfolio, and no access to a computer to adjust the trades, and the Dow drops 358 points. Not a big deal really, as it’s simulation. The position had been in profit, and is only sitting on a slight loss now, so with three more weeks till expiry there’s still a great chance to work my way out of trouble. Of course, had it been live I would have phoned my broker and closed out all positions.

But here’s the real lesson for me:

1. Daily charts do not match my lifestyle,
2. Daily charts do not match my psychology, and
3. Daily charts do not match my risk tolerance.

I wasn’t comfortable holding positions overnight when I couldn’t monitor them. And the whole ‘speed’ (or lack of speed) of the game frustrated me. Could I get used to it? Absolutely! But why bother when I’ve already found my niche. I’m a day-trader. Why try to change?

So, what’s your perfect timeframe?

The only way to find out is to try the different alternatives. These days you can get a demo or simulation platform for almost every market, and timeframe. So there’s no excuse for not trying the different timeframes to find the one that fits your psychology like a glove.

Try the short timeframes for a couple of weeks. Try the intermediate timeframes for a month or so, say the 1 or 4 hour charts. Try the daily charts for a couple of months. While you’re at it, try the weekly charts.

What you’re first attracted to is not necessarily the right fit for your psychology or lifestyle. When I first got into trading I traded the weekly charts on stocks. This changed quickly to daily charts. And then over several years it progressively got shorter and shorter. Maybe day-trading would not have suited me back then, but the thing is, I never even thought to try anything else. Had I done so, I might have saved myself years of ‘daily chart’ pain.

So what are you waiting for? Test your timeframes, and find the right one for you – the timeframe that matches both your lifestyle and your trading psychology.

Happy trading,

Author

Lance Beggs
www.yourtradingcoach.com

Posted by Admin
www.day-trading-mind.com

Discover “Next Generation Trading” systems to improve your trading results:
Learn more here.

Filed under , , by Day Trading Mind.
Permalink • Print • 

Yeah… I'm serious!

Rock Paper Scissors!

I know all the other trading educators are talking about poker and the lessons it provides in position sizing and trader psychology. I'd love to sound really cool as well and talk about No-Limit Hold 'em, or Aces over Kings, or all manner of other great-sounding terms. But the fact is that I don't know the first thing about poker. And I figure I'm not the only one.

So, here's one for all of us non-poker nerds… a game that everyone should know, which also provides an excellent lesson for traders.

If you're not familiar with Rock Paper Scissors, check out Wikipedia or the World RPS Society website. That's right… there is a worldwide body dedicated to the promotion of this game, the standardization of its rules and to overseeing the annual International World Championships.

Essentially, Rock Paper Scissors is a game that is widely used for decision making or solving disputes. Two players simultaneously deliver a hand signal representing either a rock (clenched fist), scissors (as per rock, but with the index and middle finger extended representing the two blades of a pair of scissors) or paper (open palm facing down).

Rock breaks scissors.
Scissors cut paper.
Paper covers rock.

Typically, in an informal setting the winner will be determined by the best out of three throws, although you may from time to time see a single throw, sudden-death game. If you aspire to attending the World RPS championships, the winner is determined by the best out of three sets, each set being won by the best out of three throws.

If you're confused, don't worry – personal Rock Paper Scissors trainers are available.

So, how does Rock Paper Scissors relate to trading?

Let's first examine the nature of the game. On the surface the result of each game appears to be random. Basically a coin toss, but with three outcomes instead of two – win, lose or draw. On closer examination though you'll recognize that the reality is much different. Unlike a coin toss, the outcome of each game depends on decisions made by the human participants.

And human decision making is NEVER random, particularly when there are high stakes involved.

Your decision about whether to throw rock, paper or scissors, will largely be influenced by your beliefs about your competitors decision. If you know what they're likely to throw, you'll adjust your throw to ensure it beats their choice.

A great example of this is the following exchange between Lisa and Bart in The Simpsons episode #9F16.

Lisa: "Look, there's only one way to settle this. Rock Paper Scissors."
Lisa's thought: "Poor predictable Bart. Always takes rock."
Bart's thought: "Good old rock. Nothing beats that."
Bart's throw: Rock
Lisa's throw: Paper
Bart: "D'oh!"

The result in this example is far from random. Lisa has managed to win the game through awareness of her opponent's belief systems.

In fact, there appears to be a little bit of Bart Simpson in all of us.

The World RPS Society reports statistics from a number of Rock Paper Scissors sources. The one providing the largest sample comes from the Roshambull application on Facebook, which at the time of reporting had logged over 10 million throws from over 1.6 million games. Statistics in this sample show Rock being thrown 36% of the time as opposed to paper 30% and scissors 34%. It appears that rock is more often the number one choice of Rock Paper Scissors competitors.

If you doubt that psychology plays such a great role in Rock Paper Scissors, schedule a high stakes game against a family member or friend. Something harmless of course, but high stakes – maybe the loser has to wash the winners car each fortnight for the next 12 months. You'll find that your throws are not random at all, but rather you're trying desperately to anticipate your opponents move, exploiting any knowledge you have about the way your opponent thinks.

Before you schedule this game though, let's have a quick look at how you can gain an edge at Rock Paper Scissors.

Firstly, we know from the above studies that the distribution is skewed slightly in favor of rock. So, if we're playing against a novice, the initial edge is available through throwing paper, as paper covers rock. It's a very slight edge, but it's still an edge.

Of course, the strategy will have to change against someone with a little more experience, or in fact anyone who recognizes the non-random nature of the game. These people will be expecting that we'll throw paper, in order to beat their 'obvious' rock. As a result, they're more likely to throw scissors in an attempt to beat our paper. So, instead of paper, we'll throw rock to beat their scissors.

It's all about staying one step ahead of your opponents thought processes.

There's more… watch out for two throws in a row of the same type. People are very wary of being too predictable. If your competitor has produced two throws in a row exactly the same, their next throw is statistically more likely to differ. As an example, let's say they've had two rocks in a row. Not wanting to be too predictable, they'll most likely throw either paper or scissors on the third throw. So, your choice should be scissors, as it'll win against their paper, or draw against their scissors.

Another great option is to suggest a throw to your opponent. Imagine your reaction if we were competing and I said to you, "It's so easy to read you – your next throw is going to be paper." Subconsciously I've implanted in you a desire to avoid paper. You don't want to be predictable, so you'll be more likely to throw either rock or scissors. This makes my choice easier. The edge for me is in throwing rock as it will beat your scissors, or worst-case tie against your rock.

The opposite of this is to state your own intentions before throwing. I could for example say "I'm going to smash you on this final one. Get ready for my rock." The last thing you'd expect now is for me to actually be so stupid as to throw a rock. So you'd be expecting me to throw paper or scissors, leading to your likely choice being scissors in order to get a win or draw. So, I simply give the throw I mentioned – rock – beating your scissors.

Love it!

Of course, it's not all that simple. The World RPS Society website has a strategy guide for sale if you're interested in exploring this further. Remember though, you are playing against humans. Not only are their decisions not random, but they're also often irrational. So, although you might have an edge, you're still playing over a very small sample of games. Be sure to never bet what you can't afford to lose.

So, how is this a trading analogy?

Novices mistakenly think that Rock Paper Scissors is a game of chance.

As we've seen though, Rock Paper Scissors is actually a game of skill and strategy in which success comes from being able to read your opponent, adapting your game to profit from their likely actions. Success is not guaranteed in any particular throw, but if you can successfully get within the mind of your opponent you'll gain an edge which will see you to victory over a series of throws.

Likewise with trading…

Some novices believe it's a game of fundamentals. They'll study the company reports, PE ratios, dividend yields, or wider economic factors such as the retail sales or payroll figures. They aim to find a stock or instrument which is valued differently from what they believe is its true fundamental value. They'll then enter expecting the fundamental factors to push price to their perceived 'correct' value.

Other novices believe it's a game of technicals. They'll use indicators, which are simply a derivative of price, in an attempt to predict future price movement. As price moves in a particular direction the indicators will follow, eventually triggering our novice trader into the market. There is rarely any thought as to what caused the initial price movement, or whether or not the context of the current market supports continued price movement. They operate simply on hope, that the price movement which triggered them into the trade will continue in the same direction.

In fact, neither is correct. Trading is not a game of fundamental or technical analysis.

Like Rock Paper Scissors, trading is a game of understanding people and how they make decisions.

True, your competitor is not one individual. Rather, you trade against the collective market which is made up of millions of other traders and investors all making individual buy and sell decisions.

Price moves in response to the net order flow that results from all these individual buy and sell decisions. If the net order flow is bullish, price will rise. If the net order flow is bearish, price will fall. It's as simple as that. The fundamentals don't move price. They technicals don't move price. Order flow moves price.

So, the game of trading is one of identifying those areas where a significant number of traders are going to feel compelled to take action and then entering before they enter. It doesn't matter whether you use fundamentals or technicals or any other form of analysis. If you can achieve this on a consistent basis, you've got yourself an edge.

Know what other traders are thinking – and you can position yourself to profit from their actions.

There are numerous ways of achieving this. A simple example is the use of chart pattern failures. The more obvious the chart pattern, the better. A technically perfect head and shoulders pattern will produce a large order flow short as price breaks the neckline. But should that pattern fail there will be an even greater order flow long, as the bears scramble to cover their losses. Knowing how traders will act at the point of pattern failure, I can position myself to enter long at this point, to exploit the increase in bullish order flow.

So, examine your trading approach. Whether it's based on fundamental or technical or quantitative or astrological or any other means of analysis, ensure you consider the fact that the market exists because traders make trading decisions. It's not about the technicals or fundamentals. It's about knowing what your competitor is thinking.

Like Rock Paper Scissors, if you know the likely decisions and actions of your competitor, you'll know how to position yourself for a higher probability of success.

Author:

Lance Beggs
http://www.yourtradingcoach.com

Filed under , by Day Trading Mind.
Permalink • Print • 

December 2, 2010

The Greatest Trading Loss

What is the greatest risk you face in trading?

Is it loss of money?

Certainly, that's what most traders believe. I tend to disagree though. In my opinion we have something much greater at risk, that very few of us consider during the 'learning phase'.

The American political journalist and author, Norman Cousins, is quoted as saying, 'Death is not the greatest loss in life. The greatest loss is what dies inside us while we live.'

Along similar lines, I would argue that loss of capital is not the greatest loss in trading. The greatest loss is what we lose from within.

Loss of funds is recoverable. Losses of self-esteem, self-belief, or passion for the process of trading, are not so easy to recover.

So, think about that next time you feel tempted to widen your stop, or remove your stop. Think about it before you enter your next impulsive, emotion based trade. Think about it if you’re trading without a clearly defined trading plan.

If you suffer financial losses at these times, how will it affect your mindset? Will the losses that result from your amateur and undisciplined actions allow you to move forward to the next trade with greater confidence, or will they feed the forces of frustration, anger, depression and fear, further damaging your chances at consistent, confident and disciplined application of your trading plan.

Drawdown in your psychological capital is much harder to recover, than is drawdown in your equity balance.

So, manage your risk! Not so much to protect your finances, but in order to protect your much more valuable psychological capital.

Your whole trading future depends on it.

Lance Beggs
http://www.YourTradingCoach.com

Filed under , by Day Trading Mind.
Permalink • Print • 

3 losses in a row are tough. That’s about the most consecutive losses that novice traders are psychologically prepared to accept before they feel compelled to take action and ‘correct’ the situation.

If you’re anything but a total newbie, I’m sure you’ll recognize the symptoms:
Frustration – Why me? I’ve worked so hard. Everyone else in the forum appears to be getting good results with this strategy? Nothing ever works out for me.

Anger - That strategy developer is a liar and a crook. My broker is running my stops. Someone should be held accountable for this.
Doubt – What if the strategy doesn’t work? What if I can’t trade? How am I going to support my family?
Fear– I can’t lose more money, what will everyone say about me when they know I’m a loser? How can I tell my wife/husband that I’ve lost again?
And if that’s not enough, the novice trader will likely be afflicted with the crippling inability to pull the trigger on the next trade, in fear of hitting a fourth loss in a row.

Usually, there is one of two responses:
1) The strategy is tweaked to ensure that the modified version would not have triggered these losing trades, through:
a) Swapping one indicator for another,
b) Optimising indicator parameters, or
c) Adding an additional filter.
2) Totally abandoning the strategy, usually followed by returning to their favourite forum to find the next Holy Grail strategy that is designed to make their dreams come true.

Is this the right response though?
Typically, trading decisions which are influenced by emotions rarely result in the right action.

So, what should be done?
First, before we continue, you need to confirm that you do have a valid, proven trading strategy. Have you conducted appropriate testing to satisfy yourself that it provides a positive expectancy? If not, stop trading it right now and return to testing. I don’t care what reason you had for jumping straight into a live trading environment, but the fact is that it’s difficult to psychologically trade a strategy in a consistent and disciplined manner when you don’t have complete confidence in its rules. You need to conduct thorough testing.

But assuming you have a strategy that has proven itself through positive results either in a testing or live trading environment, simply refer to your testing results or past trading history, and you’ll confirm that three losses in a row is a quite normal occurrence. In fact, it’s quite normal to have a lot more than three in a row. And it does not mean that your strategy is flawed.
Let’s look at this from a purely statistical perspective.

Image 1 Trading Psychology: Three Losses in a Row

The table above shows that given a trading strategy with a 50% win/loss ratio, the probability that you’ll get a string of three losses in a row somewhere within your next 50 trades is 99.8%.

Even if you’re achieving a win/loss ratio of 70%, you’ve still got a 73.1% chance of having a string of three losses somewhere within your next 50 trades.

It’s going to happen. It’s a normal occurrence. Accept it.
So, based on this, what’s a reasonable response from a trader following three losses in a row?

The first thing is to confirm all three trades were entered and managed in accordance with your plan. You should be doing this for every trade anyway, but if you’re a very short term trader then perhaps you don’t get an opportunity till after the session is over. If that’s the case, and you’ve get three consecutive losses which appear to be worrying you, pause to review them now. If they’re not valid trades, find out why you entered them, refocus on your plan and your goals and then continue trading. However, if they’re valid trades, you might want to consider the following action:

1) If you’re a mechanical trader, keep trading.
2) If you’re a discretionary trader, check to see if each entry is actually at the same setup area. If so, you’re possibly just not reading the market right at the moment. Consider halting your trading until the market action has changed and a new setup has developed.
3) If you still find yourself experiencing difficulty in pulling the trigger, get away from the markets for a while.
a) It’s time to take a break – relax, refresh and recharge yourself.
b) Review your trading plan and your historical results (either live or testing).
c) Carry out some visualisation and affirmation sessions, to prepare yourself for pulling that trigger once your break is over.
d) Return to the markets with the goal of correct application of your plan – don’t focus on the dollars won or lost, instead focus on the process of trading.
4) And if on returning you still find problems, well you’ve got some more serious issues that need to be worked through. I don’t mean that in a bad way, but you need to take a longer break to seriously review both your trading plan and yourself:
a) Are you taking too much risk per position? Reducing your position size can often make an incredible difference in your ability to trade in a relaxed and confident manner.
b) Do you really understand and accept the probabilistic nature of the markets? I’d suspect not. Read “Trading in the Zone” by Mark Douglas for a brilliant insight into these issues.
c) Are you consumed by fear of loss whenever it comes time to enter a trade? What is it you fear exactly? Maybe it’s time to delve into the world of trading psychology. “The Psychology of Trading” and “Enhancing Trader Performance” by Dr Brett Steenbarger would be my recommended starting point.

One final thing! If three losses in a row does not necessarily equate to a flawed strategy, then at what point should you stop trading and review your plan? Well, I don’t base this on a particular number of losses in a row, but rather on a level of drawdown. Only you can determine what should be considered a normal level of drawdown, based on your historical performance. But certainly, if you equal the historical maximum drawdown for your strategy (if not sooner) then you should be reviewing your strategy to confirm it’s based on sound fundamental principles that still apply to the current market environment. And at some stage of drawdown beyond this point, you need to have clearly defined STOP criteria. Don’t bleed your account to death. Stop, take a break if necessary, reassess the situation, conduct further testing and return stronger than ever before.

Happy trading,

Author:

Lance Beggs
www.yourtradingcoach.com

Filed under , by Day Trading Mind.
Permalink • Print • 

Filed under by Day Trading Mind.
Permalink • Print • 

Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Earning Disclaimer | External Links | Antispam | DCMA